Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Micah Press's avatar

>The difference between Matt Boland and Mark Lindsay is 0.34 errors per game, which would equate to an extra error every third game more or less.

I feel like when people disparage a referee, it's usually not because of their perceived average error rate, but rather their *inconsistency* e.g. "If so-and-so called that on one end, they should call it the same way on the other". In statistical terms, wouldn't that make the variance of a referee's errors in a L2M report more enlightening than their average errors per game?

Do you have access to the raw data so we could see the average standard deviation of errors per game and how each referee's individual variance compares?

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts